go package report

Is github.com/getkin/kin-openapi safe?

5 known vulnerabilities, worst severity CRITICAL.

cvss
9.0

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
not scored

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
4.3

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-r277-6w6q-xmqw, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-r277-6w6q-xmqw

CRITICAL

ValidationHandler.Load() in getkin/kin-openapi silently replaces a nil AuthenticationFunc with NoopAuthenticationFunc, which always returns nil without performing any credential check. Because this substitution happens unconditionally when the caller omits the field, every OpenAPI security requirement declared in the spec is silently satisfied for unauthenticated requests. An unauthenticated remot

Affected
<= 0.143.0, >=0, <0.144.0
Fixed in
0.144.0
Weakness
CWE-287
Published
2026-07-24
Source
github

GHSAreferencereferencereference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so go packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:40 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-08-21. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is github.com/getkin/kin-openapi safe? go package security report | CyberXYZ