go package report

Is github.com/esm-dev/esm.sh safe?

9 known vulnerabilities, worst severity HIGH.

cvss

7.5

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss

0.30%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score

3.3

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-rg65-45m7-hq57, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-rg65-45m7-hq57

HIGHCVE-2026-44594

A Local File Inclusion (LFI) vulnerability exists in the esbuild plugin's handling of the browser field in package.json. An attacker can publish an npm package that causes the server to read and return arbitrary files from the host filesystem during the build process.

Affected: >=0, <0.0.0-20250616164159-0593516c4cfa, < 0.0.0-20250616164159-0593516c4cfa
Fixed in: 0.0.0-20250616164159-0593516c4cfa
Weakness: CWE-22
Published: 2026-05-12
Source: osv

NVD MITRE OSV

// dependencies

0 direct

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so go packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 00:38 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-05-12. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Is github.com/esm-dev/esm.sh safe? go package security report | CyberXYZ