go package report

Is github.com/defenseunicorns/zarf safe?

1 known vulnerability.

// reach

0 direct dependencies

none carry a known advisory

    0 packages depend on it

    an advisory here reaches each of them

      Create a free accountfor every dependency path, dependent and what to upgrade
      // ai model usage

      Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so go packages are not covered.


      cvss
      0.0
      high

      severity out of 10

      epss
      0.00%
      low

      chance of exploitation in 30 days, 30th percentile of all CVEs

      xyz score
      not scored

      CyberXYZ composite out of 10

      fig. 01 — GHSA-pj97-4p9w-gx3q, the advisory selected below

      // 1 advisories

      GHSA-pj97-4p9w-gx3q

      UNKNOWNCVE-2026-40090

      A path traversal vulnerability in Zarf allows an attacker to write arbitrary files on the host system by providing a malicious package name in the package metadata. This occurs when Zarf generates SBOM or documentation outputs, or when creating a package, as it fails to properly sanitize the package name before using it in a file path.

      // cvss v3.1 vector

      CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L

      Attack vector
      Network
      Attack complexity
      Low
      Privileges required
      None
      User interaction
      Required
      Scope
      Unchanged
      Confidentiality
      None
      Integrity
      High
      Availability
      Low

      Checked 2026-10-01 at 00:04 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-07-23. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

      Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.