go package report

Is github.com/IceWhaleTech/CasaOS-UserService safe?

4 known vulnerabilities, worst severity CRITICAL.

cvss
9.1

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
1.0%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-c69x-5xmw-v44x, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-c69x-5xmw-v44x

CRITICALCVE-2024-24767

Here it is observed that the CasaOS doesn't defend against password brute force attacks, which leads to having full access to the server.

Affected
>=0.4.4-3-alpha1, <0.4.7
Fixed in
0.4.7
Weakness
CWE-307
Published
2024-03-06
Source
github

GHSANVDMITRE

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so go packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 00:38 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2024-04-01. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is github.com/IceWhaleTech/CasaOS-UserService safe? go package security report | CyberXYZ