cargo package report

Is youki safe?

3 known vulnerabilities, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
7.3

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.20%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
3.3

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-vf95-55w6-qmrf, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-vf95-55w6-qmrf

HIGHCVE-2025-62596

youki’s apparmor handling performs insufficiently strict write-target validation, which—combined with path substitution during pathname resolution—can allow writes to unintended procfs locations.

Affected
< 0.5.7
Fixed in
0.5.7
Weakness
CWE-61
Published
2025-11-05
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereferencereferencereferencereference


// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so cargo packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:44 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2025-11-05. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is youki safe? cargo package security report | CyberXYZ