cargo package report

Is uncbv safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity HIGH.

// reach

0 direct dependencies

none carry a known advisory

    0 packages depend on it

    an advisory here reaches each of them

      Create a free accountfor every dependency path, dependent and what to upgrade
      // ai model usage

      Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so cargo packages are not covered.


      cvss
      0.0
      high

      severity band, no base score published

      epss
      not scored

      chance of exploitation in 30 days

      xyz score
      0.0
      low

      CyberXYZ composite out of 10

      fig. 01 — RUSTSEC-2026-0307, the advisory selected below

      // 1 advisories

      RUSTSEC-2026-0307

      HIGH
      // summary

      uncbv extract writes each archive entry to outputdir.join(entryfilename) using the filename stored in the archive with no check for .. components or absolute paths. A malicious .cbv / .cbz archive whose entry name contains ../ (or an absolute path) can therefore cause files to be written outside the output directory chosen by the user. This is a "zip-slip" / directory-traversal arbitrary file write (CWE-22).


      Checked 2026-09-25 at 16:44 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-09-23. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

      Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
      Is uncbv safe? cargo package security report | CyberXYZ