cargo package report

Is triton-vm safe?

3 known vulnerabilities, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss
5.0

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
not scored

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-vjf8-9fx6-mv6x, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-vjf8-9fx6-mv6x

MODERATE

The instruction spongeabsorbmem Triton VM fails to verify that hashed values come from the claimed memory location. Malicious provers can substitute arbitrary data instead of actual memory contents.

Affected
>=0.42.0-alpha.4, <4.0.0, >= 0.42.0-alpha.4, < 4.0.0
Fixed in
4.0.0
Weakness
CWE-345
Published
2026-08-18
Source
osv

OSV

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so cargo packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:39 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-08-18. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is triton-vm safe? cargo package security report | CyberXYZ