cargo package report

Is tiny_http safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss
5.0

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
1.1%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-7v2r-wxmg-mgvc, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-7v2r-wxmg-mgvc

MODERATECVE-2020-35884

HTTP pipelining issues and request smuggling attacks are possible due to incorrect Transfer encoding header parsing. It is possible conduct HTTP request smuggling attacks (CL:TE/TE:TE) by sending invalid Transfer Encoding headers. By manipulating the HTTP response the attacker could poison a web-cache, perform an XSS attack, or obtain sensitive information from requests other than their own.

Affected
< 0.8.0
Fixed in
0.8.0
Weakness
CWE-444
Published
2021-08-25
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereferencereferencereferencereference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so cargo packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:31 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2021-08-25. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is tiny_http safe? cargo package security report | CyberXYZ