cargo package report

Is stackvector safe?

2 known vulnerabilities, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
7.5

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
1.0%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
3.4

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-9frf-r7c7-j2vg, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-9frf-r7c7-j2vg

HIGHCVE-2021-29939

StackVec::extend used the lower and upper bounds from an Iterator's sizehint to determine how many items to push into the stack based vector. If the sizehint implementation returned a lower bound that was larger than the upper bound, StackVec would write out of bounds and overwrite memory on the stack. As mentioned by the sizehint documentation, sizehint is mainly for optimization and incorrect im

Affected
< 1.0.9
Fixed in
1.0.9
Weakness
CWE-787
Published
2021-08-25
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so cargo packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 00:37 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2025-10-23. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is stackvector safe? cargo package security report | CyberXYZ