cargo package report

Is simple-slab safe?

2 known vulnerabilities, worst severity CRITICAL.

cvss
9.0

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
1.3%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
4.0

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-hqc8-j86x-2764, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-hqc8-j86x-2764

CRITICALCVE-2020-35893

An issue was discovered in the simple-slab crate before 0.3.3 for Rust. remove() has an off-by-one error, causing memory leakage and a drop of uninitialized memory.

Affected
>=0, <0.3.3
Fixed in
0.3.3
Weakness
CWE-125
Published
2021-08-25
Source
github

GHSANVDMITRE


// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so cargo packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 00:41 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2021-08-25. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is simple-slab safe? cargo package security report | CyberXYZ