cargo package report

Is sharks safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss

5.0

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss

not scored

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score

not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-jp37-5qhw-mffw, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-jp37-5qhw-mffw

MODERATE

Affected versions of this crate allowed for a bias when generating random polynomials for Shamir Secret Sharing, where instead of being within the range [0, 255] they were instead in the range [1, 255]. A description from Cure53, who originally found the issue, is available:

Affected: <= 0.5.0
Fixed in: not stated
Weakness: CWE-334
Published: 2024-11-18
Source: github

GHSA reference reference

// dependencies

0 direct

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so cargo packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:43 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2024-11-18. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Is sharks safe? cargo package security report | CyberXYZ