cargo package report

Is rustsec-example-crate safe?

1 known vulnerability.

// reach

0 direct dependencies

none carry a known advisory

    0 packages depend on it

    an advisory here reaches each of them

      Create a free accountfor every dependency path, dependent and what to upgrade
      // ai model usage

      Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so cargo packages are not covered.

      cvss
      not scored

      severity out of 10

      epss
      not scored

      chance of exploitation in 30 days

      xyz score
      not scored

      CyberXYZ composite out of 10

      fig. 01 — RUSTSEC-2019-0024, the advisory selected below

      // 1 advisories

      RUSTSEC-2019-0024

      UNKNOWN

      This is a test advisory useful for verifying RustSec tooling and vulnerability detection pipelines are working correctly. Aside from the fact that it is filed against an example crate, it is otherwise considered by the Advisory Database itself to be a normal security advisory.

      It's filed against rustsec-example-crate, an otherwise completely empty crate with no functionality or code, which has three releases:

      • [v0.0.0] - unaffected by this advisory (but yanked from crates.io)
      • [v0.0.1] - vulnerable according to this advisory
      • [v1.0.0] - patched by this advisory

      [v0.0.0]: https://crates.io/crates/rustsec-example-crate/0.0.0 [v0.0.1]: https://crates.io/crates/rustsec-example-crate/0.0.1 [v1.0.0]: https://crates.io/crates/rustsec-example-crate/1.0.0

      Checked 2026-10-04 at 01:07 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2019-10-08. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

      Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.