cargo package report

Is protobuf safe?

2 known vulnerabilities, worst severity HIGH.

cvss

7.5

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss

3.8%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score

3.5

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-mh6h-f25p-98f8, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-mh6h-f25p-98f8

HIGHCVE-2019-15544

Affected versions of this crate called Vec::reserve() on user-supplied input. This allows an attacker to cause an Out of Memory condition while calling the vulnerable method on untrusted data.

Affected: < 2.6.0
Fixed in: 2.6.0
Weakness: CWE-770
Published: 2021-08-25
Source: github

GHSA NVD MITRE reference reference reference reference reference reference

// dependencies

0 direct

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so cargo packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 00:41 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2025-03-07. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Is protobuf safe? cargo package security report | CyberXYZ