cargo package report

Is pleaser safe?

4 known vulnerabilities, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
7.5

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.40%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
3.3

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-vc5p-j8vw-mc6x, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-vc5p-j8vw-mc6x

HIGHCVE-2021-31155

Failure to normalize the umask in pleaser before 0.4.0 allows a local attacker to gain full root privileges if they are allowed to execute at least one command.

Affected
< 0.4.0
Fixed in
0.4.0
Weakness
CWE-269
Published
2021-08-25
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereferencereferencereference


// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so cargo packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:34 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2023-10-20. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is pleaser safe? cargo package security report | CyberXYZ