cargo package report

Is pared safe?

1 known vulnerability.

cvss

not scored

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss

not scored

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score

not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-vgmh-mqm4-8j88, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-vgmh-mqm4-8j88

UNKNOWN

Affected versions of this crate didn't provide sufficient lifetime constraints to conversion functions from alloc::sync::Arc and alloc::rc::Rc, which made it possible to create projections of these reference counted pointers. Unlike the original reference counted pointers, these projections could outlive original data's lifetimes.

Affected: >=0.0.0-0, <0.4.0, >=0
Fixed in: 0.4.0
Weakness: CWE-416
Published: 2025-03-24
Source: github

GHSA

// dependencies

0 direct

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so cargo packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 00:40 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2025-03-24. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Is pared safe? cargo package security report | CyberXYZ