cargo package report

Is ordered-float safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss
5.0

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.40%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-566x-hhrf-qf8m, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-566x-hhrf-qf8m

MODERATECVE-2020-35923

After using an assignment operators such as NotNan::addassign, NotNan::mulassign, etc., it was possible for the resulting NotNan value to contain a NaN. This could cause undefined behavior in safe code, because the safe NotNan::cmp method contains internal unsafe code that assumes the value is never NaN. (It could also cause undefined behavior in third-party unsafe code that makes the same assumpt

Affected
>= 0.2.2, < 1.1.1, = 2.0.0
Fixed in
1.1.1
Weakness
CWE-460
Published
2021-08-25
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereferencereference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so cargo packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:29 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2021-08-25. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is ordered-float safe? cargo package security report | CyberXYZ