cargo package report

Is ntpd safe?

4 known vulnerabilities, worst severity HIGH.

cvss

7.5

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss

0.70%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score

3.4

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-2xpx-vcmq-5f72, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-2xpx-vcmq-5f72

HIGHCVE-2024-38528

Missing limit for accepted NTS-KE connections allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash ntpd-rs when an NTS-KE server is configured. Non NTS-KE server configurations, such as the default ntpd-rs configuration, are unaffected.

Affected: >= 0.3.1, <= 1.1.2
Fixed in: 1.1.3
Weakness: CWE-770
Published: 2024-06-28
Source: github

GHSA NVD MITRE reference reference

// dependencies

0 direct

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so cargo packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:34 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2025-02-28. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Is ntpd safe? cargo package security report | CyberXYZ