cargo package report

Is nftnl safe?

1 known vulnerability.

cvss

not scored

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss

not scored

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score

4.0

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-2fjw-whxm-9v4q, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-2fjw-whxm-9v4q

UNKNOWN

A heap-buffer-overflow vulnerability exists in the Rust wrapper for libnftnl, triggered via the nftnl::Batch::withpagesize constructor. When a small or malformed page size is provided, the underlying C code allocates an insufficient buffer, leading to out-of-bounds writes during batch initialization.

Affected: >=0, <0.9.0, >=0.0.0-0
Fixed in: 0.9.0
Weakness: CWE-122
Published: 2025-11-25
Source: osv

OSV

// dependencies

0 direct

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so cargo packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 00:42 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2025-11-25. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Is nftnl safe? cargo package security report | CyberXYZ