cargo package report

Is miow safe?

1 known vulnerability.

cvss
not scored

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.40%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-jrcf-4jp8-m28v, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-jrcf-4jp8-m28v

UNKNOWNCVE-2020-35921

The miow crate has assumed std::net::SocketAddrV4 and std::net::SocketAddrV6 have the same memory layout as the system C representation sockaddr. It has simply casted the pointers to convert the socket addresses to the system representation. The standard library does not say anything about the memory layout, and this will cause invalid memory access if the standard library changes the implementati

Affected
>=0.0.0-0, <0.2.2, >=0.3.0-0, <0.3.6
Fixed in
0.3.6
Weakness
CWE-188
Published
2021-08-25
Source
github

GHSANVDMITRE

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so cargo packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 00:41 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2021-08-25. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is miow safe? cargo package security report | CyberXYZ