cargo package report

Is may_queue safe?

1 known vulnerability.

cvss
not scored

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
1.1%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-pphf-f93w-gc84, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-pphf-f93w-gc84

UNKNOWNCVE-2020-36217

Affected versions of mayqueue implements Send/Sync for its Queue type without restricting it to Sendable types and Syncable types.

Affected
>=0.0.0-0, <0.1.8
Fixed in
not stated
Weakness
CWE-662
Published
2021-08-25
Source
github

GHSANVDMITRE

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so cargo packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:32 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2021-08-25. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is may_queue safe? cargo package security report | CyberXYZ