cargo package report

Is matrix-sdk-ui safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss
4.9

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.20%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-h97m-27fx-42rx, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-h97m-27fx-42rx

MODERATECVE-2026-45057

The message edit validation logic in the matrix-sdk-ui crate before 0.16.1 is missing a check: when replacing an encrypted event, the replacement event itself is not required to be encrypted. This enables a malicious homeserver administrator (or an actor with equivalent power) to impersonate or spoof messages as if they were sent by a victim user.

Affected
< 0.16.1, >=0.0.0-0, <0.16.1
Fixed in
0.16.1
Weakness
CWE-345
Published
2026-06-04
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereferencereference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so cargo packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 00:42 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-06-04. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is matrix-sdk-ui safe? cargo package security report | CyberXYZ