cargo package report

Is lz4-compress safe?

1 known vulnerability.

// reach

0 direct dependencies

none carry a known advisory

    0 packages depend on it

    an advisory here reaches each of them

      Create a free accountfor every dependency path, dependent and what to upgrade
      // ai model usage

      Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so cargo packages are not covered.


      cvss
      not scored

      severity out of 10

      epss
      not scored

      chance of exploitation in 30 days

      xyz score
      not scored

      CyberXYZ composite out of 10

      fig. 01 — RUSTSEC-2017-0007, the advisory selected below

      // 1 advisories

      RUSTSEC-2017-0007

      UNKNOWN

      According to the developers this crate is no longer maintained.

      The suggested alternative is lz4-compression, a maintained fork of lz4-compress.

      See also lz-fear which is compatible with the reference LZ4 implementation in C, but not with lz4-compress.


      Checked 2026-10-04 at 01:14 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2017-04-17. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

      Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.