cargo package report

Is hyper safe?

7 known vulnerabilities, worst severity CRITICAL.

cvss
9.0

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
2.8%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
4.0

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-h3qr-rq2j-74w4, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-h3qr-rq2j-74w4

CRITICALCVE-2020-35863

Vulnerable versions of hyper allow GET requests to have bodies, even if there is no Transfer-Encoding or Content-Length header. As per the HTTP 1.1 specification, such requests do not have bodies, so the body will be interpreted as a separate HTTP request.

Affected
>= 0.11.0, < 0.12.34
Fixed in
0.12.34
Weakness
CWE-444
Published
2021-08-25
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereference


// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so cargo packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:34 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2022-06-16. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is hyper safe? cargo package security report | CyberXYZ