cargo package report

Is httpsig safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss
5.9

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.30%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-q7pg-9pr4-mrp2, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-q7pg-9pr4-mrp2

MODERATECVE-2025-59058

HMAC signature comparison is not timing-safe and is vulnerable to timing attacks.

Affected
< 0.0.19
Fixed in
0.0.19
Weakness
CWE-208
Published
2025-09-12
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so cargo packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 00:37 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2025-09-12. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is httpsig safe? cargo package security report | CyberXYZ