cargo package report

Is evm-core safe?

2 known vulnerabilities, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss

6.5

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss

1.3%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score

not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-4jwq-572w-4388, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-4jwq-572w-4388

MODERATECVE-2021-29511

Prior to the patch, when executing specific EVM opcodes related to memory operations that use evmcore::Memory::copylarge, the crate can over-allocate memory when it is not needed, making it possible for an attacker to perform denial-of-service attack.

Affected: = 0.26.0, = 0.22.0, <= 0.21.0, = 0.25.0, = 0.24.0, = 0.23.0
Fixed in: 0.26.1
Weakness: CWE-770
Published: 2024-01-30
Source: github

GHSA NVD MITRE reference reference

// dependencies

0 direct

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so cargo packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:35 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2024-01-30. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Is evm-core safe? cargo package security report | CyberXYZ