cargo package report

Is dync safe?

1 known vulnerability.

cvss
not scored

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.40%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-qxjq-v4wf-ppvh, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-qxjq-v4wf-ppvh

UNKNOWNCVE-2020-35903

VecCopy::data is created as a Vec of u8 but can be used to store and retrieve elements of different types leading to misaligned access.

Affected
>=0.0.0-0, <0.5.0
Fixed in
0.5.0
Weakness
CWE-125
Published
2021-08-25
Source
github

GHSANVDMITRE

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so cargo packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:36 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2021-08-25. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is dync safe? cargo package security report | CyberXYZ