cargo package report

Is cryptoki safe?

1 known vulnerability.

cvss
not scored

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
not scored

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-r6vc-97x9-63vv, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-r6vc-97x9-63vv

UNKNOWN

cryptoki treated the CKAALLOWEDMECHANISMS ulValueLen byte count as a

Affected
>=0.0.0-0, <0.10.1, >=0.11.0, <0.11.1, >=0.12.0, <0.12.1
Fixed in
not stated
Published
2026-09-16
Source
osv

GHSAOSV

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so cargo packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 00:38 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2026-09-16. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is cryptoki safe? cargo package security report | CyberXYZ