cargo package report

Is crossbeam-queue safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity MODERATE.

cvss
5.0

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
not scored

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
not scored

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-6888-wf7j-34jq, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-6888-wf7j-34jq

MODERATE

Affected versions of this crate called mem::zeroed() to create values of a user-supplied type T.

Affected
< 0.2.3
Fixed in
0.2.3
Published
2022-06-16
Source
github

GHSAreferencereference

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so cargo packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 00:38 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2022-06-16. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is crossbeam-queue safe? cargo package security report | CyberXYZ