cargo package report

Is conqueue safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
7.5

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.80%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
3.4

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-368f-29c3-4f2r, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-368f-29c3-4f2r

HIGHCVE-2020-36437

Affected versions of this crate unconditionally implemented Send/Sync for QueueSender<T>, allowing to send non-Send T to other threads by invoking (&QueueSender<T>).send().

Affected
< 0.4.0
Fixed in
0.4.0
Weakness
CWE-119
Published
2021-08-25
Source
github

GHSANVDMITREreferencereferencereference


// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so cargo packages are not covered.


Checked 2026-09-22 at 01:29 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2021-08-25. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is conqueue safe? cargo package security report | CyberXYZ