cargo package report

Is cap-primitives safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity LOW.

// reach

0 direct dependencies

none carry a known advisory

    0 packages depend on it

    an advisory here reaches each of them

      Create a free accountfor every dependency path, dependent and what to upgrade
      // ai model usage

      Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so cargo packages are not covered.


      cvss
      0.0
      low

      severity out of 10

      epss
      0.00%
      medium

      chance of exploitation in 30 days, 46th percentile of all CVEs

      xyz score
      0.0
      low

      CyberXYZ composite out of 10

      fig. 01 — GHSA-hxf5-99xg-86hw, the advisory selected below

      // 1 advisories

      GHSA-hxf5-99xg-86hw

      LOWCVE-2024-51756
      // impact

      cap-std's filesystem sandbox implementation on Windows blocks access to special device filenames such as "COM1", "COM2", "LPT0", "LPT1", and so on, however it did not block access to the special device filenames which use superscript digits, such as "COM¹", "COM²", "LPT⁰", "LPT¹", and so on. Untrusted filesystem paths could bypass the sandbox and access devices through those special device filenames with superscript digits, and through them provide access peripheral devices connected to the computer, or network resources mapped to those devices. This can include modems, printers, network printers, and any other device connected to a serial or parallel port, including emulated USB serial ports.

      // patches

      The bug is fixed in https://github.com/bytecodealliance/cap-std/pull/371, which is published in cap-primitives 3.4.1, cap-std 3.4.1, and cap-async-std 3.4.1.

      // workarounds

      There are no known workarounds for this issue. Affected Windows users are recommended to upgrade.

      // references
      // cvss v4.0 vector

      CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

      Attack vector
      Network
      Attack complexity
      Low
      Attack requirements
      Present
      Privileges required
      Low
      User interaction
      None
      Confidentiality (vulnerable system)
      Low
      Integrity (vulnerable system)
      Low
      Availability (vulnerable system)
      Low
      Confidentiality (subsequent systems)
      None
      Integrity (subsequent systems)
      None
      Availability (subsequent systems)
      None

      Checked 2026-09-28 at 19:47 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2024-11-05. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

      Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.