cargo package report

Is boa_engine safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity HIGH.

cvss
7.5

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss
0.60%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score
3.3

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-f67q-wr6w-23jq, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-f67q-wr6w-23jq

HIGHCVE-2024-43367

A wrong assumption made when handling ECMAScript's AsyncGenerator operations can cause an uncaught exception on certain scripts.

Affected
>=0.16.0, <0.19.0
Fixed in
0.19.0
Weakness
CWE-248
Published
2024-08-14
Source
github

GHSANVDMITRE

// dependencies

0 direct

Sign in for dependency paths and remediation

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so cargo packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:33 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2024-08-14. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.
Is boa_engine safe? cargo package security report | CyberXYZ