cargo package report

Is axum-core safe?

1 known vulnerability, worst severity HIGH.

cvss

7.5

how bad it is if exploited, out of 10

epss

1.0%

chance of exploitation in the next 30 days

xyz score

3.4

CyberXYZ composite, out of 10

fig. 01 — GHSA-m77f-652q-wwp4, the advisory selected below

// advisories

GHSA-m77f-652q-wwp4

HIGHCVE-2022-3212

<bytes::Bytes as axumcore::extract::FromRequest>::fromrequest would not, by default, set a limit for the size of the request body. That meant if a malicious peer would send a very large (or infinite) body your server might run out of memory and crash.

Affected: < 0.2.8, = 0.3.0-rc.1
Fixed in: 0.2.8
Weakness: CWE-770
Published: 2022-09-15
Source: github

GHSA NVD MITRE reference reference

// dependencies

0 direct

// ai model usage

Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so cargo packages are not covered.

Checked 2026-09-22 at 02:37 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2022-09-15. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

Is axum-core safe? cargo package security report | CyberXYZ