cargo package report

Is aesni safe?

1 known vulnerability.

// reach

0 direct dependencies

none carry a known advisory

    0 packages depend on it

    an advisory here reaches each of them

      Create a free accountfor every dependency path, dependent and what to upgrade
      // ai model usage

      Tracked for PyPI packages. HuggingFace models declare Python dependencies, so cargo packages are not covered.


      cvss
      not scored

      severity out of 10

      epss
      not scored

      chance of exploitation in 30 days

      xyz score
      not scored

      CyberXYZ composite out of 10

      fig. 01 — RUSTSEC-2021-0059, the advisory selected below

      // 1 advisories

      RUSTSEC-2021-0059

      UNKNOWN

      Please use the aes crate going forward. The new repository location is at:

      AES-NI is now autodetected at runtime on i686/x86-64 platforms. If AES-NI is not present, the aes crate will fallback to a constant-time portable software implementation.

      To prevent this fallback (and have absence of AES-NI result in an illegal instruction crash instead), continue to pass the same RUSTFLAGS which were previously required for the aesni crate to compile:

      RUSTFLAGS=-Ctarget-feature=+aes,+ssse3

      Checked 2026-10-04 at 01:12 UTC. The most recent advisory here was published 2021-04-29. Updated continuously from NVD, GHSA, OSV and CNA feeds.

      Think a verdict here is wrong? Tell us — we respond within 2 business days.