Is deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash safe to load?
CyberXYZ rates deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash LOW. No version-matched advisories and no malicious packages. It depends on 125 tracked packages, and 6 carry advisories. It does not require trust_remote_code.
LOWThe repo's commit SHA changed since we first saw it — weights were replaced.
2 more findings on this model.
- Author
- deepseek-ai
- Task
- image-text-to-text
- Loader
- transformers
- License
- mit
- Downloads
- 1,276,459
- Remote code
- not required
25 direct, 17 with findings, 114 reachable
| Package | Evidence | Advisories | Worst |
|---|---|---|---|
| pillow | direct, runtime | 147 | none pinned |
| transformers | direct, runtime | 24 | none pinned |
Is deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash safe to load?
CyberXYZ does not call a model safe in absolute terms. It rates deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash LOW. No version-matched advisories and no malicious packages. That covers its dependencies and how it loads, not every file it ships, so treat any check that did not run as unverified and check the exact files before you load them.
What does deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash depend on?
CyberXYZ tracks 125 dependencies for deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash, 25 of them direct. 6 carry advisories. They include pillow and transformers. A free account lists all of them.
Does deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash run code when it loads?
HuggingFace does not mark deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash as requiring trust_remote_code. That says nothing about the format of its weight files, which model_load_safety checks per file.
How do I check deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash before loading it?
Run the xyz MCP tool model_load_safety on deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash to get a verdict on its weight files before you load them, or search it in CyberXYZ Check at https://cyberxyz.io/check?q=deepseek-ai%2FDeepSeek-V4.1-Flash.
Risk computed 2026-11-14 at 13:45 UTC. Dependencies come from the model's requirements, its declared loader and the code it ships; advisories from NVD, GHSA and OSV.