Is akhilaaa3/Jev-Omni safe to load?
CyberXYZ rates akhilaaa3/Jev-Omni LOW. No version-matched advisories and no malicious packages. It depends on 181 tracked packages, and 7 carry advisories. It does not require trust_remote_code. A mixed serialization signal is recorded for it; the model_load_safety tool gives the per-file verdict.
LOWThe repo's commit SHA changed since we first saw it — weights were replaced.
4 more findings on this model.
- Author
- akhilaaa3
- Task
- text-classification
- Loader
- transformers
- License
- apache-2.0
- Downloads
- 4,770
- Remote code
- not required
24 direct, 15 with findings, 168 reachable
| Package | Evidence | Advisories | Worst |
|---|---|---|---|
| pillow | direct, install | 147 | none pinned |
| opencv-python | direct, runtime | 31 | none pinned |
Is akhilaaa3/Jev-Omni safe to load?
CyberXYZ does not call a model safe in absolute terms. It rates akhilaaa3/Jev-Omni LOW. No version-matched advisories and no malicious packages. That covers its dependencies and how it loads, not every file it ships, so treat any check that did not run as unverified and check the exact files before you load them.
What does akhilaaa3/Jev-Omni depend on?
CyberXYZ tracks 181 dependencies for akhilaaa3/Jev-Omni, 24 of them direct. 7 carry advisories. They include pillow and opencv-python. A free account lists all of them.
Does akhilaaa3/Jev-Omni run code when it loads?
HuggingFace does not mark akhilaaa3/Jev-Omni as requiring trust_remote_code. That says nothing about the format of its weight files, which model_load_safety checks per file.
How do I check akhilaaa3/Jev-Omni before loading it?
Run the xyz MCP tool model_load_safety on akhilaaa3/Jev-Omni to get a verdict on its weight files before you load them, or search it in CyberXYZ Check at https://cyberxyz.io/check?q=akhilaaa3%2FJev-Omni.
Risk computed 2026-11-14 at 12:41 UTC. Dependencies come from the model's requirements, its declared loader and the code it ships; advisories from NVD, GHSA and OSV.