ai model report

Is LiquidAI/LFM2.5-VL-3B-DSpark-GGUF safe to load?

CLEAN risk. 0 of 1 tracked dependencies carry advisories. Driven by No version-matched advisories and no malicious packages..

View on HuggingFace

// posture
advisories 100provenance 100resolution 100xyz safety 100load safety 70supply chain 100scanner trust 100code execution 100
fig. 01 — posture on eight axes, 100 is clean. Weakest: load safety at 70.
// the finding
not scoredno advisory applies to a version this model pinsCLEAN
Author
LiquidAI
Task
image-text-to-text
Loader
llama.cpp
License
other
Downloads
110
Remote code
not required
// dependencies

1 direct

PackageEvidenceAdvisoriesWorst
llama-cppdirect, runtime0none pinned

Risk computed 2026-09-25 at 11:45 UTC. Dependencies come from the model's requirements, its declared loader and the code it ships; advisories from NVD, GHSA and OSV.

Model risk is computed from the model's declared and observed Python dependencies and the code it ships. If a finding is wrong, tell us.
Is LiquidAI/LFM2.5-VL-3B-DSpark-GGUF safe to load? AI model security report | CyberXYZ